As it relates to the academic study of the Bible in the 20 th century, there are primarily two opposing poles that have emerged among scholars — with biblical minimalists on the one end, and biblical maximalists on the other. To oversimplify, minimalists tend to not consider the Bible as a valid historical document due to the contradictions that can be found between the biblical narrative and all that has been dug up by archaeologists over the past century in the Near East. Maximalists, on the other hand, usually assume that the Bible texts are more or less correct, unless archaeological evidence can incontrovertibly prove otherwise. To exacerbate matters, some radical minimalists in the field have not only raised the question of historical reliability of the Bible, but they have altogether dismissed it as being purely fictional — only to be read as (religious) literature. Most scholars hate these labels because, after all, a label is just a label, and nothing is ever so clear...
Making sense of the Wadi el-Hol and Serabit el-Khadim early alphabetic inscriptions. Exploring the Egyptian origins of the alphabet and proto-Judaism.