Skip to main content

HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVES: TO B(IBLE), OR NOT TO B(IBLE), THAT IS THE QUESTION...

As it relates to the academic study of the Bible in the 20th century, there are primarily two opposing poles that have emerged among scholarswith biblical minimalists on the one end, and biblical maximalists on the other. To oversimplify, minimalists tend to not consider the Bible as a valid historical document due to the contradictions that can be found between the biblical narrative and all that has been dug up by archaeologists over the past century in the Near East. Maximalists, on the other hand, usually assume that the Bible texts are more or less correct, unless archaeological evidence can incontrovertibly prove otherwise. To exacerbate matters, some radical minimalists in the field have not only raised the question of historical reliability of the Bible, but they have altogether dismissed it as being purely fictionalonly to be read as (religious) literature.

Most scholars hate these labels because, after all, a label is just a label, and nothing is ever so clear-cut. The topic of the validity of the Bible as being archaeologically relevant is hardly a question of just black or white—there is a whole spectrum of possibilities to consider. 

In terms of epigraphic studies, the Bible has proven to be an indispensable reference tool that can help us understand the past. The reason why I discuss minimalism and maximalism here is to bring up a sort of middle-ground perspective that often gets neglected, or overlooked, ironically, because it cannot be so easily labeled as belonging to either sides of what is actually a broad spectrum of approaches. This view considers the Bible texts as being a sort of multilayered folk-memory, or cultural memory. For instance, Egyptologist Jan Assmann, in his writings regarding cultural memory, sees Moses not as a historical figure, but an embodiment of culture (Moses the Egyptian: The Memory of Egypt in Western Monotheism, 1998). In a similar vein, archaeologist Aren Maeir, of Bar Ilan University, also sees the whole Exodus story as being a ‘mnemo-narrative’, a sort of cultural memory that has remained with the ancient Israelites. Maeir (as I mention in my book) is of the opinion that the authors of the Bible likely reconstructed a variety of stories regarding their ancient Egyptian origins, thus reconstructing them into a comprehensive text that can be found to exist in the Hebrew Bible. Egyptologist Rosalie David writes about scholars who take this kind of middle-ground perspective in relation to the biblical Exodus narrative. As she writes, there are those scholars who “have agreed that the Exodus did not occur at all as a historical event, but was perhaps a Canaanite folk-memory of the expulsion, or [some scholars have suggested] even that the Biblical account may be a compilation of several historical events which perhaps occurred over a considerable length of time” (1).

Being in total agreement with Maier, I also prefer to see the whole biblical Exodus storyline as a sort of collective memory of some very real historical events, albeit ones which have been reconstructed. If you can bear watching me in the short video linked below (I am featured in the last half), I discuss the historical perspectives which I adopted in writing my book, Deciphering the Proto-Sinaitic Script. The focus has been placed on my three-pronged approach—three, because my book not only deals with the origins and development of proto-Sinaitic writing, but it also touches on Egyptian history, as well as trying to make sense of some of the early Bible texts (as a folk-memory of the Semitic-cultured inventors of the world’s first alphabet). But, please don’t call me a maximalist! I also hate labels.   



Notes
(1) p. 269. In Rosalie David’s Religion and Magic in Ancient Egypt. Penguin Books, 2002.




Comments

  1. Hi Paul, I have been studying Ahmose for a long time and I personally think his cult, centred on Abydos for 250 years, reverberates throughout the Bible, even into the New Testament and with Jesus himself!

    ReplyDelete
  2. I definitely do believe that there is much left to uncover in understanding the Egyptian cultural/religious influences on neighbouring contemporary cultures, namely Semitic, which have come down to us through the ages. I just find it odd to think that many religious scholars seem to often have a very literal interpretation of biblical texts--folklore does not emerge from a vacuum.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Since 1990 I have maintained that Ahmose I was recast as Moses in the Exodus, and that the Exodus, is, in part, recalling the Hyksos Expulsion of circa 1546 BC. I say, in part, because of recent (1970s-1990s) archaeological findings in Canaan and Moab. Joshua, in the Bible, is credited with burning the fallen walls of Jericho. In the 1950s Dame Kathleen Kenyon re-excavated Jericho and determined its last walls, which had been burned, were to be dated to the Hyksos Expulsion. Bingo! The Hyksos Expulsion is the Exodus! But excavations (1970s-1990s) in Moab, which fell to Moses, had sites that came into existence only in Iron Age I, circa 1220-1100 BC. Conclusion: The Bible had conflated two historical events, combining them into one event, Jericho's fall and burning of 1546 BC and the founding of Iron Age I villages in Moab by Israel and Moses. Why? The Bible has the answer: Israel after the conquest, married the Canaanites in Iron Age I. Thus, the Israelites of Iron Age II (1100 BC-587 BC) could truly say they were the heirs or descendants of the Hyksos Expulsion via intermarriages with Canaanites in Iron Age I. I have 70 YouTube videos on the Bible and Archaeology, just click on my name by my photo to access them. You can also visit my website, www.bibleorigins.net for more info. I am a retired teacher of History, Geography and Art, aged 75 years. I look forward to buying your book soon and reading its contents.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Walter, I am certainly happy to hear that you have very much come to same conclusions as I have as far as linking the historical figure of Ahmose as a prototype for Moses, and the Hyksos Expulsion with the biblical Exodus. Undoubtedly, in these recent times, it certainly appears to me that archaeologists are dredging up the history of the Bible, no less. The connection you make between the fact that Jericho’s walls date to around the same time as the Hyksos Expulsion is a perfect example of this. And, as you also observe, the much later founding of Moab certainly appears to have been somehow ‘conflated’ or absorbed into the folk-memory of the local Canaanite population. It looks like we're on the same page: The Biblical narrative was certainly not born out of an axiological vacuum! The story of the covenant between God and the Israelites through Moses did not take shape in someone’s head suddenly and unexpectedly. In a sense, the whole Moses storyline, at the core of Judaism, was a consequence of all those long lost historical events that we have just begun to dig up... Yet, surprisingly, there are still many who would rather believe otherwise... I’m interested to check out your videos when I have some extra time this week.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

DECIPHERING THE PROTO-SINAITIC SCRIPT: ABOUT MY NEW BOOK

From its initial appearance, in around the 18th century BC, the origins of proto–Sinaitic writing can be traced back to Egypt’s Middle Kingdom period, when it was somehow derived from the hieroglyphs, its parent–system. The importance of proto–Sinaitic lies in the fact that it represents the alphabet’s earliest developmental period—a kind of ‘missing link’ between the hieroglyphs and these early Semitic alphabets from which our own Latin one descends, by way of the Phoenician and Greek. However, up until now, proto-Sinaitic has remained for the most part undeciphered. The intriguing possibility of giving voice to a lost culture or civilization from thousands of years ago is tantalizing. Representing one of the most enticing problems in modern archaeology, the  enigmatic allure surrounding ancient languages and the undeciphered scripts in which they are encoded is truly vexing. In the course of my research into deciphering the proto-Sinaitic inscriptions, I have inadvertently ...

Homo Symbolicum and the Written Word: Perpetuating the Human Mind After Death

Since the very earliest times, we humans have dreamed of overcoming the limits imposed by our bodies, and of using technology to surpass the intellectual, physical or psychological boundaries of our existence. The development of writing in the ancient world is usually ranked as one of the most important of human cultural achievements, as significant as the domestication of fire, the invention of agriculture, and even the development of the wheel. With the invention of the alphabet, writing technology has given us a means to record our words and therefore allows our thoughts to outlive us; the dead can speak to the living. The use of the alphabet permits us to build on the knowledge of others, over generations. It is at the  core  of our civilization — and some would go so far as to say it is at the essence of our  humanness . The technology of writing, it could be said, is a sort of ‘brain storage’ device. Ernst Cassirer, the 20 th  century Jewis...